Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
John Isner vs Quentin Halys Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Isner vs Halys analysis and find out who is favored!
John Isner vs Quentin Halys Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Isner 1 - 0 Halys
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Isner has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Halys has won 49.21%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Isner, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Halys has won 46.85%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.7% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Isner has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Halys has saved 62.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Isner has won 45.45% of matches played (W/L 5/ 6), with Halys winning 47.73% (W/L 21/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Isner has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 66% (W/L 56/ 29), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 76/ 66). Halys has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 128/ 93), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 101/ 91).
- Player level: In the last year, Isner has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 4/ 3), where as Halys has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 14/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Isner winning 1 times and Halys being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Isner winning 3 and Halys winning 1. The last match between Isner and Halys was at the French Open - Paris, 22-05-2022, First, Clay with John Isner getting the victory 7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(1) 7-6(6).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:20:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Isner and Halys have played a deciding set 0 times, with Isner winning 0 times and Halys 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Isner winning 3, and Halys 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Isner has played against opponents with an average rank of 130.18 while Halys has played against players with an average rank of 217.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Isner has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Halys has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Isner has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Halys has converted 35.93% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
304
Rank
8
High
39
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
187
Rank
61
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
61% (561-352)
Career Total W/L
56% (373-299)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
48% (13-14)
$15,094,425
Career Prize Money
$1,246,220
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | John Isner | Quentin Halys |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 1 |
| Games Won | 25 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 27 | 22 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:20:0 | 3:20:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (102/155) | 56% (80/143) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (80/102) | 81% (65/80) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 62% (33/53) | 62% (39/63) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 20% (2/10) |
| Return Points W% | 27% (39/143) | 27% (42/155) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(1) 7-6(6) |
Stats 
John Isner
Player
Quentin Halys
66%
(
102 of
155)
1st Serve %
56%
(
80 of
143)
27
Aces
22
5
Double Faults
7
78%
(
80 of
102)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
65 of
80)
62%
(
33 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
27%
(
42 of
155)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
39 of
143)
152
Total Points Won
146
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | John Isner | Quentin Halys |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 48% (13/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 48% (31/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (321/327) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.79 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 250 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 90 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:44:46 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 222.89 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 56% (1144/2026) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 77% (882/1144) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (434/882) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 36% (60/167) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (756/2087) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (9/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (12/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 83% (12/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (12/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 20% (15/3) |
John Isner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
John Isner
72%
(
115 of
160)
1st Serve %
69%
(
111 of
162)
19
Aces
48
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
91 of
115)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
96 of
111)
62%
(
28 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
26%
(
41 of
160)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
40 of
162)
159
Total Points Won
163
|
3-6 4-6 7-6(3) 6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Isner
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
75 of
113)
11
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
52 of
75)
83%
(
25 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
16 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
113)
112
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
John Isner
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
5
Aces
20
3
Double Faults
5
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
17 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
John Isner
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
8
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Isner
Player
Rinky Hijikata
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
19
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominik Koepfer
Player
John Isner
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
98)
4
Aces
21
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
53 of
63)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
54 of
71)
67%
(
24 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
22%
(
22 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
23 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
John Isner
79%
(
55 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
5
Aces
20
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
41 of
50)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
17 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
John Isner
Player
Tommy Paul
64%
(
73 of
114)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
20
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
7
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
49 of
63)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
41 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
107
Total Points Won
106
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
John Isner
Player
Corentin Moutet
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
89%
(
33 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Isner
Player
Alex Bolt
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
20
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
34 of
42)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Quentin Halys Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Quentin Halys
61%
(
58 of
95)
1st Serve %
50%
(
46 of
92)
2
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
36 of
46)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
58%
(
69 of
120)
1st Serve %
71%
(
94 of
133)
13
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
56 of
69)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
58 of
94)
43%
(
22 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
42 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
52 of
133)
130
Total Points Won
123
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Alexis Galarneau
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Quentin Halys
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Mathias Bourgue
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
10
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Arthur Gea
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Quentin Halys
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Quentin Halys
56%
(
72 of
129)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
0
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
58%
(
33 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
39%
(
50 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jozef Kovalik
Player
Quentin Halys
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
1
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Ivan Gakhov
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Isner Vs Halys Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
